From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Disposition of Petitions for Discretionary Review

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Nov 4, 1999
351 N.C. 640 (N.C. 1999)

Opinion


541 S.E.2d 140 (N.C. 1999) 351 N.C. 640 Ronnie L. AKINS and wife Cynthia P. Akins, Donald R. Payne, Jr. and wife Katherine Payne, Barney W. Hill, Ivan Wray Coleman and wife Elizabeth J. Coleman, Sue Trivette Dale, Timothy J. Bolton and wife Amy R. Bolton, Charles W. Atwood, Randy Hoosier and wife Deborah Hoosier, Ventris Dale Norris and wife Fonda Ward-Norris, Michael Eric Muldrow and wife Denise Runyon Muldrow, Michael H. Starnes and wife Vivian M. Starnes, Theco, Inc., Alice E. Younts and husband Delmar Younts, Donnie R. Trotter and wife Arlene G. Trotter, Sandra Workman, Ralph L. Collett, and John J. Collett, Jr., Petitioners, v. CITY OF THOMASVILLE, a Municipal Corporation, Respondent. Ronnie L. Akins and wife Cynthia P. Akins, Donald R. Payne, Jr. and wife Katherine Payne, Barney W. Hill, Ivan Wray Coleman and wife Elizabeth J. Coleman, Sue Trivette Dale, Timothy J. Bolton and wife Amy R. Bolton, Charles W. Atwood, Randy Hoosier and wife Deborah Hoosier, Ventris Dale Norris and wife Fonda Ward-Norris, Michael Eric Muldrow and wife Denise Runyon Muldrow, Michael H. Starnes and wife Vivian M. Starnes, James Hayes Stone and wife Betty Shuler Stone, Richard C. Edinger, Jr. and wife Judy Edinger, Benny E. Bowers, Phil J. Bryant and wife Janie R. Bryant, Ernest J. Perkins and wife Nancy S. Perkins, Douglas K. Conrad, Harold Ensley and wife Elizabeth Ensley, and Theco, Inc., Petitioners, v. City of Thomasville, a Municipal Corporation, Respondent. No. 429P99. Supreme Court of North Carolina November 4, 1999

         S.J. Crow, Asheville, for Akins, et al.

         Roddey M. Ligon, Jr., Winston-Salem, Paul Rush Mitchell, for Thomasville.

          ORDER

         Upon consideration of the petition filed by Plaintiffs in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

Page 141.

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 4th day of November 1999."

         Justice MARTIN recused.


Summaries of

Disposition of Petitions for Discretionary Review

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Nov 4, 1999
351 N.C. 640 (N.C. 1999)
Case details for

Disposition of Petitions for Discretionary Review

Case Details

Full title:DISPOSITION OF PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Nov 4, 1999

Citations

351 N.C. 640 (N.C. 1999)
351 N.C. 640

Citing Cases

Vaughan v. Mashburn

Thus, "a plaintiff may ‘dismiss an action that originally was filed within the statute of limitations and…

Newcomb v. County of Carteret

o Rule 54(b), with respect to the issue of Carteret County's right to control permanent structures in…