Summary
holding when a defendant “execut[es] a Form 60 and pay compensation pursuant thereto, a defendant admits only the compensability of the employee's injury”
Summary of this case from Chenette v. Metokote Corp.Opinion
2001
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Disposition of Petitions for Discretionary Review
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jan 1, 2001
353 N.C. 398 (N.C. 2001)
Summaries of
Disposition of Petitions for Discretionary Review
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jan 1, 2001
353 N.C. 398 (N.C. 2001)
holding when a defendant “execut[es] a Form 60 and pay compensation pursuant thereto, a defendant admits only the compensability of the employee's injury”
Summary of this case from Chenette v. Metokote Corp.Case details for
Disposition of Petitions for Discretionary Review
Case Details
Full title:DISPOSITION OF PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date published: Jan 1, 2001
Citations
353 N.C. 398 (N.C. 2001)
547 S.E.2d 42
Citing Cases
WRIGHT v. SIMPSON'S EGGS
Id. at 132, 620 S.E.2d at 291 (internal citations omitted). See also Watts v. Hemlock Homes of the Highlands,…
Watts v. Hemlock Homes of the Highlands, Inc.Defendant appealed this order to this Court, which vacated the order, holding that the superior court…