When the Commission denies benefits because the claimant failed to meet her burden of proof, the substantial-evidence standard of review requires that we affirm if the Commission's decision displays a substantial basis for the denial of relief. Frances v. Gaylord Container Corp., 341 Ark. 527, 20 S.W.3d 280 (2000). Substantial evidence exists if reasonable minds could reach the Commission's opinion. Dismute v. Potlach Corp., 2014 Ark. App. 176. In reviewing the Commission's decision, we view the evidence and all reasonable inferences in the light most favorable to the Commission's findings. Id.
In reviewing a decision of the Workers' Compensation Commission, we view the evidence and all reasonable inferences in the light most favorable to the Commission's findings, and the decision will be affirmed if it is supported by substantial evidence. Dismute v. Potlatch Corp., 2014 Ark. App. 176, 2014 WL 988922. Substantial evidence exists if reasonable minds could reach the Commission's conclusion.