finding the commission did not err when it failed to renew the liquor permit of a bar that was located in a high crime area and the bar, at least by inaction, was a contributing factor to drug activity
Summary of this case from Marciano v. Ohio Liquor Control Comm.1991.
finding the commission did not err when it failed to renew the liquor permit of a bar that was located in a high crime area and the bar, at least by inaction, was a contributing factor to drug activity
Summary of this case from Marciano v. Ohio Liquor Control Comm.Full title:DISMISSALS, SUA SPONTE
Court:Supreme Court of Ohio
Date published: Jan 1, 1991
{¶ 29} Several courts have rejected arguments similar to those appellant raises. See Leo G. Keffalas, Inc. v.…
In re One New England, Pardner, ShotgunFurthermore, the language in R.C. 2923.13(A)(3) referring to "any offense involving * * * any drug of abuse"…