Summary
concluding an offender with six convictions arising out of acts occurring over a four-day period was not a first offender under R.C. 2953.31
Summary of this case from State v. YordeOpinion
1996.
concluding an offender with six convictions arising out of acts occurring over a four-day period was not a first offender under R.C. 2953.31
Summary of this case from State v. Yorde1996.
concluding an offender with six convictions arising out of acts occurring over a four-day period was not a first offender under R.C. 2953.31
Summary of this case from State v. YordeFull title:DISMISSALS, SUA SPONTE
Court:Supreme Court of Ohio
Date published: Jan 1, 1996
Defendant's two convictions do not merge into a single offense under R.C. 2953.31(A). See State v. Derugen…
State v. WilsonHowever, where questions of law are in dispute, an appellate court reviews the trial court's determination de…