Opinion
September 18, 1995
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Ruskin, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
The plaintiff's claim regarding the inconsistency of the verdict is unpreserved for appellate review (see, Gross v Fontano, 206 A.D.2d 505). In any event, the verdict was not inconsistent (see, Rubin v Pecoraro, 141 A.D.2d 525).
Further, the jury's findings were not against the weight of the evidence, as they were supported by a fair interpretation of the evidence (see, Briccio v Disbrow, 212 A.D.2d 565; Moskowitz v Israel, 209 A.D.2d 676). Sullivan, J.P., Miller, Thompson and Ritter, JJ., concur.