Opinion
11-CV-500A
10-17-2012
ORDER
The above-referenced case was referred to Magistrate Judge Leslie G. Foschio, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). On September 25, 2012, Magistrate Judge Foschio filed a Report and Recommendation, recommending that Plaintiffs' motion for sanctions [17], seeking to strike Defendant's answer [7], as a sanction for failing to comply with discovery, with default entered in favor of Plaintiffs should be granted and that Plaintiffs' motion seeking summary judgment [18] is dismissed as moot without prejudice.
The Court has carefully reviewed the Report and Recommendation, the record in this case, and the pleadings and materials submitted by the parties, and no objections having been timely filed, it is hereby
ORDERED, that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and for the reasons set forth in Magistrate Judge Foschio's Report and Recommendation, Plaintiffs' motion for sanctions [17], seeking to strike Defendant's answer [7], as a sanction for failing to comply with discovery, with default entered in favor of Plaintiffs is granted, and Plaintiffs' motion seeking summary judgment [18] is dismissed as moot without prejudice.
The case is referred back to Magistrate Judge Foschio for further proceedings.
SO ORDERED.
________________________
HONORABLE RICHARD J. ARCARA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE