Summary
explaining that, proof of actual prejudice must be specific, particularized and non-speculative
Summary of this case from State v. WalkerOpinion
1997.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Discretionary Appeals Allowed
Supreme Court of Ohio
Jan 1, 1997
680 N.E.2d 154 (Ohio 1997)
Summaries of
Discretionary Appeals Allowed
Supreme Court of Ohio
Jan 1, 1997
680 N.E.2d 154 (Ohio 1997)
explaining that, proof of actual prejudice must be specific, particularized and non-speculative
Summary of this case from State v. WalkerCase details for
Discretionary Appeals Allowed
Case Details
Full title:DISCRETIONARY APPEALS ALLOWED
Court:Supreme Court of Ohio
Date published: Jan 1, 1997
Citations
680 N.E.2d 154 (Ohio 1997)
79 Ohio St. 3d 1420
Citing Cases
YOUNG v. BRIDGESTONE APM COMPANY
Moreover, the Supreme Court had already dismissed one case presenting the effect of a voluntary dismissal of…
State v. WallsProof of actual prejudice must be specific, particularized and non-speculative. State v. Heath (Feb. 3,…