From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Disciplinary Counsel v. Sopkovich

Supreme Court of Ohio
Jan 13, 2004
802 N.E.2d 1121 (Ohio 2004)

Opinion

No. 1995-1199.

Submitted January 12, 2004.

Decided January 13, 2004.


On Application for Reinstatement

{¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by respondent, Carol A. Sopkovich, Attorney Registration No. 0016795, last known business address in Girard, Ohio.

{¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of March 5, 1996, wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), suspended respondent for a period of two years with one year stayed on condition, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A). Therefore,

{¶ 3} IT IS ORDERED by this court that respondent be and hereby is reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio.

{¶ 4} IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication.

{¶ 5} For earlier case, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Sopkovich (1996), 75 Ohio St.3d 192, 661 N.E.2d 1066.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O'Connor and O'Donnell, JJ., Concur.


Summaries of

Disciplinary Counsel v. Sopkovich

Supreme Court of Ohio
Jan 13, 2004
802 N.E.2d 1121 (Ohio 2004)
Case details for

Disciplinary Counsel v. Sopkovich

Case Details

Full title:Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Sopkovich

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Jan 13, 2004

Citations

802 N.E.2d 1121 (Ohio 2004)
802 N.E.2d 1121
2004 Ohio 414