From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Disciplinary Counsel v. Rammelsberg

Supreme Court of Ohio
Dec 17, 2013
998 N.E.2d 1188 (Ohio 2013)

Opinion

NO. 2013-0312

2013-12-17

Disciplinary Counsel v. Rammelsberg



DISCIPLINARY CASES


The Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline of the Supreme Court of Ohio filed a certification of default in the office of the clerk of this court. On March 22, 2013, this court imposed an interim default-judgment suspension upon respondent, Sharri Una Rammelsberg, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6a)(B)(1). Respondent was ordered to show cause why the interim default-judgment suspension should not be converted into an indefinite suspension. Respondent filed objections, relator filed an answer, and this cause was considered by the court.

On consideration thereof, it is ordered by this court that this matter is remanded to the board for further proceedings under Gov.Bar R. V(6), including a formal hearing on relator's complaint.

The court further orders that the interim default-judgment suspension imposed against respondent on March 22, 2013, shall remain in place while this matter is pending before the board. Proceedings before this court in this case are stayed until further order of this court.

O'Donnell and Kennedy, JJ., would remand for consideration of mitigation evidence only.


Summaries of

Disciplinary Counsel v. Rammelsberg

Supreme Court of Ohio
Dec 17, 2013
998 N.E.2d 1188 (Ohio 2013)
Case details for

Disciplinary Counsel v. Rammelsberg

Case Details

Full title:Disciplinary Counsel v. Rammelsberg

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Dec 17, 2013

Citations

998 N.E.2d 1188 (Ohio 2013)
137 Ohio St. 3d 1435

Citing Cases

Disciplinary Counsel v. Rammelsberg

Rammelsberg objected to the show-cause order, and we remanded the case to the board for further proceedings.…