From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Disciplinary Counsel v. Maxwell

Supreme Court of Ohio
Aug 12, 1998
697 N.E.2d 597 (Ohio 1998)

Opinion

No. 97-2185

Submitted May 13, 1998.

Decided August 12, 1998.

Jonathan E. Coughlan, Disciplinary Counsel, and Harald F. Craig III, Assistant Disciplinary Counsel, for relator.

David C. Maxwell, pro se.



We adopt the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the board. Respondent is hereby suspended from the practice of law for two years, with one year of the suspension stayed on the condition that respondent make restitution, if any, as determined by relator; that he enter into an arrangement with the Ohio Lawyers Assistance Program ("OLAP") relating to his treatment for alcoholism and/or substance abuse, if any; that he abstain from alcohol and drugs; that he be subject to random testing by OLAP; that he attend Alcoholics Anonymous meetings and any other recovery program recommended by OLAP; and that his OLAP monitor report periodically to relator about respondents compliance. These conditions shall be in effect during the entire two-year period, and restitution is to be made prior to respondents seeking a stay of the second year of suspension. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Disciplinary Counsel v. Maxwell

Supreme Court of Ohio
Aug 12, 1998
697 N.E.2d 597 (Ohio 1998)
Case details for

Disciplinary Counsel v. Maxwell

Case Details

Full title:OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. MAXWELL

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Aug 12, 1998

Citations

697 N.E.2d 597 (Ohio 1998)
697 N.E.2d 597

Citing Cases

Disciplinary Counsel v. Walker

We find that the board's recommended sanction is consistent with sanctions imposed for comparable misconduct.…

Cuyahoga Cty. Bar Assn. v. Bogart

A stayed suspension with the conditions recommended by the board is an appropriate sanction for respondent's…