From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Disciplinary Counsel v. Large

Supreme Court of Ohio
Feb 10, 2011
2011 Ohio 1081 (Ohio 2011)

Opinion

No. 2009-0041.

Submitted February 3, 2011.

Decided February 10, 2011.

ON APPLICATION FOR REINSTATEMENT


{¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by respondent, John Harold Large, Attorney Registration No. 0068732, last known business address in Warren, Ohio.

{¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of May 6, 2009, wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), suspended respondent for a period of one year, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A).

{¶ 3} Therefore, it is ordered by this court that respondent is reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio.

{¶ 4} It is further ordered that the Clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication.

{¶ 5} For earlier case, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Large, 122 Ohio St.3d 35, 2009-Ohio-2022, 907 N.E.2d 1162.

O'CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O'DONNELL, LANZINGER, CUPP, and MCGEE BROWN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Disciplinary Counsel v. Large

Supreme Court of Ohio
Feb 10, 2011
2011 Ohio 1081 (Ohio 2011)
Case details for

Disciplinary Counsel v. Large

Case Details

Full title:DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. LARGE

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Feb 10, 2011

Citations

2011 Ohio 1081 (Ohio 2011)
2011 Ohio 1081

Citing Cases

Toledo Bar Ass'n v. Manore

d attorneys whose misconduct was limited to convictions for violating federal tax laws. SeeDisciplinary…