From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Disciplinary Counsel v. Fuhry

SUPREME COURT OF OHIO
Mar 10, 2020
2020 Ohio 858 (Ohio 2020)

Opinion

No. 2017-0489

03-10-2020

DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. FUHRY.


{¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by respondent, Gigi Hoang Fuhry, Attorney Registration No. 0071630, last known address in Medina, Ohio.

{¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of December 6, 2017, wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(12)(A)(3), suspended respondent from the practice of law for a period of two years with six months stayed on condition, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(24).

{¶ 3} Therefore, it is ordered by this court that respondent is reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio.

{¶ 4} It is further ordered that the clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(D)(1) and that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(D)(2).

{¶ 5} For earlier case, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Fuhry , 151 Ohio St.3d 549, 2017-Ohio-8813, 90 N.E.3d 933.

O'Connor, C.J., and Kennedy, French, Fischer, DeWine, Donnelly, and Stewart, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Disciplinary Counsel v. Fuhry

SUPREME COURT OF OHIO
Mar 10, 2020
2020 Ohio 858 (Ohio 2020)
Case details for

Disciplinary Counsel v. Fuhry

Case Details

Full title:DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. FUHRY.

Court:SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

Date published: Mar 10, 2020

Citations

2020 Ohio 858 (Ohio 2020)
159 Ohio St. 3d 1226
149 N.E.3d 546