From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Disciplinary Counsel v. Frenden

Supreme Court of Ohio
Oct 10, 1996
671 N.E.2d 260 (Ohio 1996)

Opinion

No. 95-2597

Submitted and decided October 10, 1996.

ON APPLICATION FOR REINSTATEMENT.


This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by respondent John A. Frenden, a.k.a. John Anthony Frenden, Attorney Registration No. 0031512, last known business address in Cleveland, Ohio.

The court coming now to consider its order of February 28, 1996, wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), suspended respondent for a period of six months, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A). Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED by this court that John A. Frenden, a.k.a. John Anthony Frenden, be, and hereby is, reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication.

For earlier case, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Frenden (1996), 74 Ohio St.3d 601, 660 N.E.2d 1152.

MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and STRATTON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Disciplinary Counsel v. Frenden

Supreme Court of Ohio
Oct 10, 1996
671 N.E.2d 260 (Ohio 1996)
Case details for

Disciplinary Counsel v. Frenden

Case Details

Full title:OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. FRENDEN

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Oct 10, 1996

Citations

671 N.E.2d 260 (Ohio 1996)
77 Ohio St. 3d 1206

Citing Cases

Cuyahoga County Bar Assn. v. Frenden

We reinstated respondent's license on October 10, 1996. See Disciplinary Counsel v. Frenden (1996), 77 Ohio…