From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Disciplinary Counsel v. Brown

Supreme Court of Ohio
Nov 2, 2001
757 N.E.2d 1160 (Ohio 2001)

Opinion

No. 98-399.

Submitted October 16, 2001.

Decided November 2, 2001.

On Amended Petition for Reinstatement.


This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an amended petition for reinstatement by respondent, Paul Raymond Brown. In accordance with Gov.Bar R. V(10)(F), respondent's amended petition for reinstatement was referred to the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline. The Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline filed its Final Report in this court on August 29, 2001, recommending that Paul Raymond Brown be reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio. No objections to said Final Report were filed.

The court now considers its order of November 10, 1998, indefinitely suspending respondent, Paul Raymond Brown, from the practice of law pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(2). On consideration thereof, and the Final Report of the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline,

IT IS ORDERED BY THE COURT that the respondent, Paul Raymond Brown, Attorney Registration No. 0037693, last known business address in Columbus, Ohio, be, and hereby is, reinstated to the practice of law in Ohio.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that respondent be taxed the costs of these proceedings in the amount of $963.39, less the deposit of $500, for a total balance due of $463.39, which costs shall be payable to this court on or before ninety days from the date of this order, by certified check or money order. It is further ordered that if these costs are not paid in full on or before ninety days from the date of this order, interest at the rate of ten percent per annum shall accrue as of ninety days from the date of this order, on the balance of unpaid board costs. It is further ordered that if costs are not paid in full on or before ninety days from the date of this order, respondent may be found in contempt and may be suspended until costs, including any accrued interest, are paid in full.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication.

For earlier case, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Brown (1998), 84 Ohio St.3d 1, 701 N.E.2d 681.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Disciplinary Counsel v. Brown

Supreme Court of Ohio
Nov 2, 2001
757 N.E.2d 1160 (Ohio 2001)
Case details for

Disciplinary Counsel v. Brown

Case Details

Full title:Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Brown

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Nov 2, 2001

Citations

757 N.E.2d 1160 (Ohio 2001)
757 N.E.2d 1160