Disciplinary Action Against Anderson

2 Citing cases

  1. IN THE MATTER OF ROBB

    615 N.W.2d 125 (N.D. 2000)   Cited 4 times
    Disciplining an attorney who was not currently licensed to practice law in North Dakota, but was admitted to practice in North Dakota, by commencing his license suspension if and when the disciplined attorney reapplied for a license

    If an attorney commingles and converts client property for the attorney's own use, the attorney violates the rule. Disciplinary Action Against Anderson, 491 N.W.2d 703, 703 (N.D. 1992). [ΒΆ 10] Here, clear and convincing evidence shows Robb violated N.D.R. Prof. Conduct 1.15(a) by failing to hold a portion of Leno's settlement proceeds separate from his own property.

  2. Disciplinary Action Against Lashkowitz

    502 N.W.2d 502 (N.D. 1993)   Cited 2 times

    Furthermore, we have disbarred attorneys before when we found the conversion of clients' funds coupled with other aggravating factors. See In re Disciplinary Action against Anderson, 491 N.W.2d 703 (N.D. 1992). Thus, under these facts, we conclude that Lashkowitz's conduct requires disbarment.