Opinion
No. CA 09-00798.
December 30, 2009.
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Oneida County (Michael E. Daley, J.), entered November 21, 2008. The order granted the motions and cross motion of defendants for, inter alia, summary judgment.
LUIBRAND LAW FIRM, PLLC, LATHAM (KEVIN A. LUIBRAND OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS.
KERNAN AND KERNAN, P.C., UTICA (LEIGHTON R. BURNS OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS WILLIAM S. CALLI, CALLI, CALLI AND CULLY, L.L.P., AND CALLI AND CALLI, L.P.
HISCOCK BARCLAY, LLP, SYRACUSE (KEVIN M. HAYDEN OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS ROBERT CALLI, HERBERT CULLY, AND CALLI, CALLI AND CULLY.
SMITH, SOVIK, KENDRICK SUGNET, P.C., SYRACUSE (MICHELLE M. WESTERMAN OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS ANDREW S. KOWALCZYK, JOSEPH STEPHEN DEERY, JR., AND CALLI, KOWALCZYK, TOLLES, DEERY AND SOJA.
GETNICK LIVINGSTON ATKINSON GIGLIOTTI PRIORE, LLP, UTICA (PATRICK G. RADEL OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT THOMAS S. SOJA.
Present: Smith, J.P., Peradotto, Green, Pine and Gorski, JJ.
It is hereby ordered that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs ( see Hughes v Nussbaumer, Clarke Velzy, 140 AD2d 988; Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. v Roberts Roberts, 63 AD2d 566, 567; see also CPLR 5501 [a] [1]).