From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Disanto v. State

Supreme Court of Florida.
Oct 20, 2014
160 So. 3d 893 (Fla. 2014)

Opinion

No. SC14–1311.

10-20-2014

Seth D. DISANTO, Petitioner(s) v. STATE of Florida, Respondent(s).


Opinion

The petition for writ of prohibition is hereby denied because petitioner has failed to demonstrate that a lower court is attempting to act in excess of its jurisdiction. See Mandico v. Taos Constr., Inc., 605 So.2d 850 (Fla.1992) ; English v. McCrary, 348 So.2d 293 (Fla.1977).

PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, CANADY, and PERRY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Disanto v. State

Supreme Court of Florida.
Oct 20, 2014
160 So. 3d 893 (Fla. 2014)
Case details for

Disanto v. State

Case Details

Full title:Seth D. DISANTO, Petitioner(s) v. STATE of Florida, Respondent(s).

Court:Supreme Court of Florida.

Date published: Oct 20, 2014

Citations

160 So. 3d 893 (Fla. 2014)