From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

DiSanto v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Jun 10, 2021
No. 5336-20S (U.S.T.C. Jun. 10, 2021)

Opinion

5336-20S

06-10-2021

Virginia M. DiSanto & Joseph D. DiSanto Petitioners v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Respondent


ORDER

Maurice B. Foley, Chief Judge

On August 7, 2020, respondent filed a Motion To Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction as to Petitioner Joseph D. DiSanto on the ground that no notice of deficiency or any other notice sufficient to confer jurisdiction on this Court, was issued to Mr. DiSanto for taxable year 2017. Although the Court directed petitioners to file an objection, if any, to respondent's motion to dismiss as to Mr. DiSanto, petitioners failed to do so.

The premises considered, it is

ORDERED that respondent's Motion To Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction is granted in that so much of this case relating to petitioner Joseph D. DiSanto is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. It is further

ORDERED that the caption of this case is amended to read: "Virginia M. DiSanto, Petitioner v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent".


Summaries of

DiSanto v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Jun 10, 2021
No. 5336-20S (U.S.T.C. Jun. 10, 2021)
Case details for

DiSanto v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Case Details

Full title:Virginia M. DiSanto & Joseph D. DiSanto Petitioners v. Commissioner of…

Court:United States Tax Court

Date published: Jun 10, 2021

Citations

No. 5336-20S (U.S.T.C. Jun. 10, 2021)