From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dirito v. Stanley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Apr 15, 1994
203 A.D.2d 903 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

April 15, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Oswego County, Hayes, J.

Present — Green, J.P., Pine, Fallon, Callahan and Boehm, JJ.


Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly dismissed plaintiffs' demand for damages for "emotional and mental pain [and] suffering" in this legal malpractice action. We reject plaintiffs' argument that such damages are recoverable in a legal malpractice action, whether based on the negligence or breach of contract causes of action asserted in the complaint (see, Green v Leibowitz, 118 A.D.2d 756, 757-758; see also, Jensen v Whitford Co., 167 A.D.2d 826; Lancellotti v Howard, 155 A.D.2d 588, 589-590; Fowler v Town of Ticonderoga, 131 A.D.2d 919, 921).

Plaintiffs have abandoned their appeal from that part of the order dismissing their demand for punitive damages by failing to brief that issue (see, Agee v Ajar, 154 A.D.2d 569, 571-572, appeal dismissed 75 N.Y.2d 916).


Summaries of

Dirito v. Stanley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Apr 15, 1994
203 A.D.2d 903 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Dirito v. Stanley

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH T. DIRITO, JR., et al., Appellants, v. MICHAEL J. STANLEY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Apr 15, 1994

Citations

203 A.D.2d 903 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
611 N.Y.S.2d 65

Citing Cases

Wolkstein v. Morgenstern

All of plaintiff's causes of action are based on Morgenstern's alleged legal malpractice. A cause of action…

Taylor v. Paskoff

"[E]motional damages are not recoverable in a legal malpractice action." ( Kaiser v Van Houten, 12 AD3d 1012,…