From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Diresta v. State

Florida Court of Appeals, Fifth District
Nov 5, 2021
No. 5D21-999 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Nov. 5, 2021)

Opinion

5D21-999

11-05-2021

ADAM DIRESTA, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Adam Diresta, Okeechobee, pro se. No Appearance for Appellee.


NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

3.800 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County, LT Case No. 98-CF-8255 Tanya Davis Wilson, Judge.

Adam Diresta, Okeechobee, pro se.

No Appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM

Adam Diresta, pro se, appeals the postconviction court's denial of his Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) motion to correct illegal sentence in Orange County Circuit Court Case No. 98-CF-8255. We affirm the postconviction court's order and caution Diresta that abusive, repetitive, malicious, or frivolous filings directed to Orange County Circuit Court Case No. 98-CF-8255 may result in sanctions such as a bar on pro se filings in this Court and referral to prison officials for disciplinary proceedings, which may include forfeiture of gain time. See State v. Spencer, 751 So.2d 47 (Fla. 1999); § 944.279(1), Fla. Stat. (2020).

AFFIRMED; WARNING ISSUED

LAMBERT, C.J., HARRIS, and WOZNIAK, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Diresta v. State

Florida Court of Appeals, Fifth District
Nov 5, 2021
No. 5D21-999 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Nov. 5, 2021)
Case details for

Diresta v. State

Case Details

Full title:ADAM DIRESTA, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Court:Florida Court of Appeals, Fifth District

Date published: Nov 5, 2021

Citations

No. 5D21-999 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Nov. 5, 2021)