Directv, Inc. v. Jarrard (N.D.Ind. 2006)

Full title: DIRECTV, INC., Plaintiff, v. CURTIS JARRARD, Defendant

Court: United States District Court, N.D. Indiana, South Bend Division

Date published: Jul 28, 2006

3:05-cv-679 (N.D. Ind. Jul. 28, 2006)

Opinion

3:05-cv-679.

July 28, 2006

ORDER

ALLEN SHARP, District Judge

On March 29, 2006, Magistrate Judge Christopher Nuechterlein entered a Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 57) recommending that the Motion for Clerk's Entry of Default as to Curtis Jarrard (Docket No. 56) filed by Plaintiff, DIRECTV, be denied. Magistrate Judge Nuechterlein stated, "before a default judgment under Rule 37(b)(2)(C) may be entered, there are certain steps that a plaintiff needs to take to develop the record." Report and Recommendation at 1. Magistrate Judge Nuechterlein then set forth the necessary steps. The parties were given until April 12, 2006 to file objections to the Report and Recommendation and were notified that failure to file objections within the specified time would constitute a waiver of their right to appeal the district court's order. No objections have been filed in this matter. Upon review, this Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 57). Plaintiff's Motion for Entry of Default against Jarrard (Docket No. 56) is DENIED. If DIRECTV wishes, and after the appropriate record has been made, it may refile its motion in accordance with Rule 37(b)(2)(C).

SO ORDERED.