From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

DiPpolito v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Aug 11, 2015
Civ. No. 13-0175 (RBK) (JS) (D.N.J. Aug. 11, 2015)

Opinion

Civ. No. 13-0175 (RBK) (JS)

08-11-2015

FRANK DIPPOLITO, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., Defendants.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Plaintiff is a former federal prisoner who was previously incarcerated at F.C.I. Fort Dix in Fort Dix, New Jersey. He is proceeding pro se with a civil rights complaint pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). Currently pending before the Court is several defendants' joint motion for judgment on the pleadings with respect to plaintiff's first amended complaint. (See Dkt. No. 29.) That motion was filed on December 3, 2014.

On April 17, 2015, Magistrate Judge Schneider granted plaintiff's motion to amend his first amended complaint and the second amended complaint was deemed filed and served as of April 17, 2015. (See Dkt. No. 48.) Therefore, as plaintiff's operative complaint is now the second amended complaint, defendants' motion for judgment on the pleadings on the first amended complaint will be denied. It is worth noting that defendants have filed two separate motions to dismiss the second amended complaint (including the defendants who filed a motion for judgment on the pleadings on the first amended complaint) (see Dkt. Nos. 50 & 52.) that are also currently pending before the Court. Those motions will be analyzed in due course.

Accordingly, IT IS this 11th day of August, 2015,

ORDERED that defendants' motion for judgment on the pleadings on the first amended complaint (Dkt. No. 29.) is denied as the first amended complaint is no longer the operative complaint in this action; and it is further

ORDERED that the Clerk shall serve this Order on plaintiff by regular U.S. mail.

s/Robert B. Kugler

ROBERT B. KUGLER

United States District Judge

Bivens is the federal counterpart to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. See Walker v. Zenk, 323 F. App'x 144, 145 n.1 (3d Cir. 2009) (per curiam) (citing Egervary v. Young, 366 F.3d 238, 246 (3d Cir. 2004)).


Summaries of

DiPpolito v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Aug 11, 2015
Civ. No. 13-0175 (RBK) (JS) (D.N.J. Aug. 11, 2015)
Case details for

DiPpolito v. United States

Case Details

Full title:FRANK DIPPOLITO, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Date published: Aug 11, 2015

Citations

Civ. No. 13-0175 (RBK) (JS) (D.N.J. Aug. 11, 2015)