From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dipasquale v. Ronald

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 8, 2010
74 A.D.3d 471 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)

Opinion

No. 2974.

June 8, 2010.

Appeal from order, Supreme Court, New York County (Shirley Werner Kornreich, J.), entered May 18, 2009, which denied plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment on his fourth cause of action in the amended complaint, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as taken from a nonappealable order.

Richardson Patel, LLP, New York (David B. Gordon of counsel), for appellant.

Reid Davis LLP, New York (Rachel S. Fleishman of counsel), for respondents.

Before: Gonzalez, P.J., Sweeny, Richter, Abdus-Salaam and Román, JJ.


Although plaintiff captioned his motion as one for partial summary judgment, the IAS court correctly held it to be a motion for reargument of a portion of a 2008 order that had granted defendants partial summary judgment dismissing the fourth cause of action. Since no appeal lies from the denial of a motion for reargument, even if not denominated as such ( see Johnson v Fuller Co., 235 AD2d 348), this appeal must be dismissed.


Summaries of

Dipasquale v. Ronald

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 8, 2010
74 A.D.3d 471 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
Case details for

Dipasquale v. Ronald

Case Details

Full title:DOUGLAS DIPASQUALE, Appellant, v. RONALD GUTFLEISH et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 8, 2010

Citations

74 A.D.3d 471 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
2010 N.Y. Slip Op. 4836
901 N.Y.S.2d 837

Citing Cases

Vazquez v. JRG Realty Corp.

Defendant's witnesses stated that the area was nearly flat and their expert measured the defect and found it…

Mejia–ortiz v. Inoa

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Patricia Anne Williams, J.), entered April 23, 2010, which, to the extent…