From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dionne v. People

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jan 13, 2011
No. CIV S-10-3362 DAD P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 13, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV S-10-3362 DAD P.

January 13, 2011


ORDER


Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se. In accordance with the court's December 22, 2010 order, petitioner has filed an amended petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, naming the proper respondent. However, after conducting a cursory review of petitioner's amended petition, the court has determined that it must dismiss the petition because it is incomplete. Specifically, on the form petition, petitioner instructs the court to "see attached" for his grounds for relief. However, petitioner has not included any attachments with his petition. In the interest of justice, the court will grant petitioner thirty days leave to file a second amended petition.

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Petitioner's December 29, 2010 amended petition for writ of habeas corpus is dismissed with leave to file a second amended petition within thirty days from the date of this order;

2. Any second amended petition must be filed on the form employed by this court, must name the proper respondent, and must state all claims and prayers for relief on the form. It must bear the case number assigned to this action and must bear the title "Second Amended Petition"; and

3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send petitioner the form for habeas corpus application.

DATED: January 12, 2011.


Summaries of

Dionne v. People

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jan 13, 2011
No. CIV S-10-3362 DAD P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 13, 2011)
Case details for

Dionne v. People

Case Details

Full title:JEREMY DIONNE, Petitioner, v. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Jan 13, 2011

Citations

No. CIV S-10-3362 DAD P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 13, 2011)