From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Diolosa v. Ryan Auto.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division
Sep 16, 2024
No. A-1838-23 (App. Div. Sep. 16, 2024)

Opinion

A-1838-23

09-16-2024

JOSEPH C. DIOLOSA JR., individually and on behalf of similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. RYAN AUTOMOTIVE INC, OPEN ROAD AUTO GROUP LLC, RODMAN H. RYAN, MICHAEL MORAIS, OPEN ROAD HONDA, OPEN ROAD VOLKSWAGEN, and OPEN ROAD ACURA, Defendants-Respondents.

The Law Office of Jonathan Rudnick, LLC, attorneys for appellant (Jonathan Rudnick, on the brief). Methfessel & Werbel, attorneys for respondents (Scott Ketterer, on the brief).


This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court ." Although it is posted on the internet, this opinion is binding only on the parties in the case and its use in other cases is limited. R. 1:36-3.

Submitted September 11, 2024

On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Bergen County, Docket No. L-2532-23.

The Law Office of Jonathan Rudnick, LLC, attorneys for appellant (Jonathan Rudnick, on the brief).

Methfessel & Werbel, attorneys for respondents (Scott Ketterer, on the brief).

Before Judges Rose and Puglisi.

PER CURIAM

The parties to the appeal have settled the issues between them. In accordance with the stipulation they have filed, the appeal is dismissed with prejudice and without costs.


Summaries of

Diolosa v. Ryan Auto.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division
Sep 16, 2024
No. A-1838-23 (App. Div. Sep. 16, 2024)
Case details for

Diolosa v. Ryan Auto.

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH C. DIOLOSA JR., individually and on behalf of similarly situated…

Court:Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division

Date published: Sep 16, 2024

Citations

No. A-1838-23 (App. Div. Sep. 16, 2024)