From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Diodato v. Rosetti

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
Oct 2, 1959
19 Misc. 2d 780 (N.Y. App. Term 1959)

Opinion

October 2, 1959

Appeal from the Municipal Court of the City of New York, Borough of Brooklyn, JAMES W. FEELEY, J.

Charles H. Tenney, Corporation Counsel ( Robert L. Ellis of counsel), for appellant.

Leon Washor for respondent.


The decision of the trial court was against the weight of the credible evidence. Moreover, it was error to exclude evidence of the convictions of plaintiff and his principal witness for the crime of book-making.

The judgment should be reversed on the law and facts and a new trial ordered, with $30 costs to defendant to abide the event.

PETTE and HART, JJ., concur; BROWN, J., dissents and votes to dismiss the complaint on the merits.


Summaries of

Diodato v. Rosetti

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
Oct 2, 1959
19 Misc. 2d 780 (N.Y. App. Term 1959)
Case details for

Diodato v. Rosetti

Case Details

Full title:ALFRED DIODATO, Respondent, v. THOMAS E. ROSETTI, as Property Clerk of…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department

Date published: Oct 2, 1959

Citations

19 Misc. 2d 780 (N.Y. App. Term 1959)
195 N.Y.S.2d 865