From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Diocese of Fort Wayne-South Bend, Inc. v. Burwell

Supreme Court of the United States
May 16, 2016
578 U.S. 969 (2016)

Opinion

No. 15–1003.

05-16-2016

DIOCESE OF FORT WAYNE–SOUTH BEND, INC., et al., petitioners, v. Sylvia BURWELL, Secretary of Health and Human Services, et al.


On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. Petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit in light of Zubik v. Burwell, 578 U.S. –––– (2016). Nothing in the Zubik opinion, or in the opinions or orders of the courts below, is to affect the ability of the Government to ensure that women covered by petitioners' health plans ‘obtain, without cost, the full range of FDA approved contraceptives.’ Wheaton College v. Burwell, 573 U.S. ––––, –––– (2014) (slip op., at 1). Through this litigation, respondents have made the Government aware of their view that they meet ‘the requirements for exemption from the contraceptive coverage requirement on religious grounds.’ Id., at ––– – (slip op., at 2). Nothing in the Zubik opinion, or in the opinions or orders of the courts below, ‘precludes the Government from relying on this notice, to the extent it considers it necessary, to facilitate the provision of full contraceptive coverage’ going forward. Ibid. Because the Government may rely on this notice, the Government may not impose taxes or penalties on petitioners for failure to provide the relevant notice. Justice SOTOMAYOR, with whom Justice GINSBURG joins, concurs in the decision to grant, vacate, and remand in this case for the reasons expressed in Zubik v. Burwell, 578 U.S. –––– (2016) ( Sotomayor, J., concurring).


Summaries of

Diocese of Fort Wayne-South Bend, Inc. v. Burwell

Supreme Court of the United States
May 16, 2016
578 U.S. 969 (2016)
Case details for

Diocese of Fort Wayne-South Bend, Inc. v. Burwell

Case Details

Full title:DIOCESE OF FORT WAYNE–SOUTH BEND, INC., et al., petitioners, v. Sylvia…

Court:Supreme Court of the United States

Date published: May 16, 2016

Citations

578 U.S. 969 (2016)
578 U.S. 969
195 L. Ed. 2d 211

Citing Cases

Ozinga v. Price

This court rejected the challenges brought by these not-for-profit employers in multiple decisions. See Univ.…