From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

DiNunzio v. Williams

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Nov 4, 2022
2:21-CV-0995-APG-NJK (D. Nev. Nov. 4, 2022)

Opinion

2:21-CV-0995-APG-NJK

11-04-2022

DAVID J. DINUNZIO Petitioner, v. BRIAN WILLIAMS et al., Respondents.

AARON D. FORD Attorney General GERRI LYNN HARDCASTLE Deputy Attorney General.


AARON D. FORD Attorney General GERRI LYNN HARDCASTLE Deputy Attorney General.

RESPONDENTS' MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME TO ANSWER TO PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS (FIRST REQUEST)

ANDREW P. GORDON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

Respondents, Brian Williams, et al. (Respondents), by and through counsel, Aaron D. Ford, Attorney General of the State of Nevada, and Gerri Lynn Hardcastle, Deputy Attorney General, move this Court for a thirty-one-day enlargement of time, or up to and including Monday, December 5, 2022, to file and serve their answer to Petitioner, David J. DiNunzio's (DiNunzio) petition for writ of habeas corpus. ECF No. 8.

This motion is based on the provisions of Rule 6(b)(1)(A) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the attached declaration of counsel, as well as all other pleadings and materials on file herein.

This is Respondents' first request for an enlargement of time to answer to DiNunzio's petition since this Court denied their motion to dismiss and ordered an answer on the merits. See ECF No. 33 at 5. Respondents make this motion in good faith and not for the purpose of unnecessary delay.

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

DiNunzio v. Williams

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Nov 4, 2022
2:21-CV-0995-APG-NJK (D. Nev. Nov. 4, 2022)
Case details for

DiNunzio v. Williams

Case Details

Full title:DAVID J. DINUNZIO Petitioner, v. BRIAN WILLIAMS et al., Respondents.

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Nov 4, 2022

Citations

2:21-CV-0995-APG-NJK (D. Nev. Nov. 4, 2022)