From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dinkins v. Miller

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 16, 2015
Case No. CV 14-2842-AB (KK) (C.D. Cal. Apr. 16, 2015)

Opinion

Case No. CV 14-2842-AB (KK)

04-16-2015

NEELY LEJON DINKINS, Petitioner, v. AMY MILLER, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. The Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which Petitioner has objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Judgment be entered (1) denying the Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus; and (2) dismissing this action with prejudice. Dated: April 16, 2015

/s/_________

HONORABLE ANDRÉ BIROTTE, JR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Dinkins v. Miller

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 16, 2015
Case No. CV 14-2842-AB (KK) (C.D. Cal. Apr. 16, 2015)
Case details for

Dinkins v. Miller

Case Details

Full title:NEELY LEJON DINKINS, Petitioner, v. AMY MILLER, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Apr 16, 2015

Citations

Case No. CV 14-2842-AB (KK) (C.D. Cal. Apr. 16, 2015)