From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dinkens v. Crosby

United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Jacksonville Division
Feb 8, 2006
Case No. 3:05-cv-284-J-20HTS (M.D. Fla. Feb. 8, 2006)

Opinion

Case No. 3:05-cv-284-J-20HTS.

February 8, 2006


ORDER OF DISMISSAL


On October 21, 2005, this Court ordered Petitioner, within thirty days, to either file a Reply to Respondents' Answer or notify the Court that he does not intend to file a Reply. Further, the Court stated that, if he intends to amend his Petition, he shall file a motion for leave to amend with a proposed amended petition within thirty days. It has now been over three (3) months since the October 21, 2005, Order, and there has been no response from Petitioner. It appears that Petitioner no longer wishes to proceed in this action.

Therefore, it is now

ADJUDGED:

1. This case is DISMISSED.

2. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment dismissing this case for Petitioner's lack of prosecution.

3. The Clerk of the Court shall close this case.

DONE AND ORDERED.


Summaries of

Dinkens v. Crosby

United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Jacksonville Division
Feb 8, 2006
Case No. 3:05-cv-284-J-20HTS (M.D. Fla. Feb. 8, 2006)
Case details for

Dinkens v. Crosby

Case Details

Full title:ENOCH EUGENE DINKENS, JR., Petitioner, v. JAMES V. CROSBY, JR., et al.…

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Jacksonville Division

Date published: Feb 8, 2006

Citations

Case No. 3:05-cv-284-J-20HTS (M.D. Fla. Feb. 8, 2006)