From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dingle v. Tesluk

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Nov 4, 2021
2:20-cv-1878 JAM DB P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 4, 2021)

Opinion

2:20-cv-1878 JAM DB P

11-04-2021

DAVID W. DINGLE, Plaintiff, v. GREGORY C. TESLUK, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff claims defendants violated his rights under the Eighth Amendment. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On August 17, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 16.) Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. ////

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed August 17, 2021, are adopted in full; and

2. This action is dismissed without prejudice.


Summaries of

Dingle v. Tesluk

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Nov 4, 2021
2:20-cv-1878 JAM DB P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 4, 2021)
Case details for

Dingle v. Tesluk

Case Details

Full title:DAVID W. DINGLE, Plaintiff, v. GREGORY C. TESLUK, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Nov 4, 2021

Citations

2:20-cv-1878 JAM DB P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 4, 2021)