From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dingle v. Pergament Home Centers, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 27, 1988
141 A.D.2d 798 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Opinion

June 27, 1988

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Goldstein, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs, and the defendant's time to pay the $500 is extended until 30 days after the service upon it of a copy of this decision and order, with notice of entry.

Under the circumstances of this case, we conclude that the Supreme Court acted properly in imposing a monetary sanction upon the defendant as a condition of vacating its prior default (see, Berlin v Schlotthauer, 117 A.D.2d 768; Mineroff v Macy's Co., 97 A.D.2d 535).

The defendant's claim that the Supreme Court acted improperly in conditioning its vacatur order upon the defendant's waiver of its defense of lack of personal jurisdiction is not properly before this court by reason of the fact that its notice of appeal specifically limited the appeal to that part of the order which imposed monetary sanctions on the defendant. "An appeal from only part of an order constitutes a waiver of the right to appeal from the other parts of that order" (Royal v Brooklyn Union Gas Co., 122 A.D.2d 132, 133; CPLR 5515). Mollen, P.J., Lawrence, Weinstein and Balletta, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Dingle v. Pergament Home Centers, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 27, 1988
141 A.D.2d 798 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)
Case details for

Dingle v. Pergament Home Centers, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:LUCINDA DINGLE, Respondent, v. PERGAMENT HOME CENTERS, INC., Sued Herein…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 27, 1988

Citations

141 A.D.2d 798 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Citing Cases

Sugar Creek Stores, Inc. v. Pitts

In their notice of appeal, plaintiffs specified that the appeal was limited to those parts of the order that…

Soyer v. Perricone

Further, since the divorce judgment was silent as to other payments to preserve the property, including…