From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dingle v. Barbosa

United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Beaumont Division
Dec 9, 2024
Civil Action 1:24-CV-200 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 9, 2024)

Opinion

Civil Action 1:24-CV-200

12-09-2024

MARTHUR L. DINGLE v. DETECTIVE BARBOSA


ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Michael J. Truncale, United States District Judge

Plaintiff Marthur L. Dingle, a prisoner confined at the Jefferson County Correctional Facility, proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

The Court referred this matter to the Honorable Christine L. Stetson, United States Magistrate Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this Court. On November 12, 2024, the magistrate judge recommended dismissing the action without prejudice for want of prosecution pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). To date, the parties have not filed objections to the report and recommendation.

The Court received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to such referral, along with the record, pleadings and all available evidence. After careful review, the Court finds that the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the United States Magistrate Judge are correct.

ORDER

Accordingly, the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the magistrate judge are correct, and the report of the magistrate judge [Dkt. 5] is ADOPTED. A final judgment will be entered in accordance with this memorandum order.


Summaries of

Dingle v. Barbosa

United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Beaumont Division
Dec 9, 2024
Civil Action 1:24-CV-200 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 9, 2024)
Case details for

Dingle v. Barbosa

Case Details

Full title:MARTHUR L. DINGLE v. DETECTIVE BARBOSA

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Beaumont Division

Date published: Dec 9, 2024

Citations

Civil Action 1:24-CV-200 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 9, 2024)