Exh. K, ¶6. The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals per curiam affirmed the post conviction court's ruling. Exh. O; Dingess v. State, 23 So. 3d 1194 (Fla. 5th DCA 2009). In the instant Petition, Petitioner acknowledges that the trial court disposed of his Rule 3.850 motion on the prejudice prong of Strickland, Petition at 7. Petitioner generally asserts that the "trial court erred in applying an irrelevant prejudice examination" regarding each of the instances of counsel's alleged ineffectiveness.