From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dingeldey v. VMI-EPE-Holland B.V.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Oct 26, 2016
15-CV-916A (W.D.N.Y. Oct. 26, 2016)

Opinion

15-CV-916A

10-26-2016

SCOTT DINGELDEY, Plaintiff, v. VMI-EPE-HOLLAND B.V. and VMI HOLLAND, B.V., Defendants.


DECISION AND ORDER

The above-referenced case was referred to Magistrate Judge Leslie G. Foschio, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). On September 28, 2016, Magistrate Judge Foschio filed a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 11), recommending that defendants' motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction (Dkt. No. 3) be denied.

The Court has carefully reviewed the Report and Recommendation, the record in this case, and the pleadings and materials submitted by the parties, and no objections having been timely filed, it is hereby

ORDERED, that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and for the reasons set forth in Magistrate Judge Foschio's Report and Recommendation, defendants' motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction is denied.

The case is referred back to Magistrate Judge Foschio for further proceedings.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/_________

HONORABLE RICHARD J. ARCARA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Dated: October 26, 2016


Summaries of

Dingeldey v. VMI-EPE-Holland B.V.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Oct 26, 2016
15-CV-916A (W.D.N.Y. Oct. 26, 2016)
Case details for

Dingeldey v. VMI-EPE-Holland B.V.

Case Details

Full title:SCOTT DINGELDEY, Plaintiff, v. VMI-EPE-HOLLAND B.V. and VMI HOLLAND, B.V.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Oct 26, 2016

Citations

15-CV-916A (W.D.N.Y. Oct. 26, 2016)