From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Din v. Annucci

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Apr 4, 2019
9:17-CV-1147 (LEK/DEP) (N.D.N.Y. Apr. 4, 2019)

Opinion

9:17-CV-1147 (LEK/DEP)

04-04-2019

AH DIN, Petitioner, v. ANTHONY J. ANNUCCI, Respondent.


ORDER

I. INTRODUCTION

This matter comes before the Court following a Report-Recommendation filed on February 15, 2019, by the Honorable David E. Peebles, U.S. Magistrate Judge, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Local Rule 72.3. Dkt. No. 21 ("Report-Recommendation").

II. LEGAL STANDARD

Within fourteen days after a party has been served with a copy of a magistrate judge's report-recommendation, the party "may serve and file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations." Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); L.R. 72.1(c). If objections are timely filed, a court "shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made." § 636(b). However, if no objections are made, a district court need review the report-recommendation only for clear error. Barnes v. Prack, No. 11-CV-857, 2013 WL 1121353, at *1 (N.D.N.Y. Mar. 18, 2013); Farid v. Bouey, 554 F. Supp. 2d 301, 306-07, 306 n.2 (N.D.N.Y. 2008), abrogated on other grounds by Widomski v. State Univ. of N.Y. at Orange, 748 F.3d 471 (2d Cir. 2014). "A [district] judge . . . may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge." § 636(b).

III. DISCUSSION

No objections were filed in the allotted time period. Accordingly, the Court has reviewed the Report-Recommendation for clear error and has found none. The Court therefore adopts the Report-Recommendation in its entirety.

IV. CONCLUSION

Accordingly, it is hereby:

ORDERED, that the Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 21) is APPROVED and ADOPTED in its entirety; and it is further

ORDERED, that Petitioner's amended petition (Dkt. No. 7) is DISMISSED for failure to prosecute and for failure to comply with the Local Rules regarding notification of any pro se litigant's change of address; and it is further

ORDERED, that the Clerk of the Court serve a copy of this Order on all parties in accordance with the Local Rules.

IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: April 04, 2019

Albany, New York

/s/_________

Lawrence E. Kahn

U.S. District Judge


Summaries of

Din v. Annucci

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Apr 4, 2019
9:17-CV-1147 (LEK/DEP) (N.D.N.Y. Apr. 4, 2019)
Case details for

Din v. Annucci

Case Details

Full title:AH DIN, Petitioner, v. ANTHONY J. ANNUCCI, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Apr 4, 2019

Citations

9:17-CV-1147 (LEK/DEP) (N.D.N.Y. Apr. 4, 2019)

Citing Cases

Abreu v. Weston

Thus, the relevant factors weigh in favor of dismissing the action, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) and…