From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dimonda v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
May 30, 2012
93 So. 3d 361 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

Opinion

No. 4D11–388.

2012-05-30

Nicholas DIMONDA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Andrew L. Siegel, Judge; L.T. Case No. 96–23351 CF10A. Nicholas Dimonda, Doral, pro se. No appearance required for appellee.


Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Andrew L. Siegel, Judge; L.T. Case No. 96–23351 CF10A.
Nicholas Dimonda, Doral, pro se. No appearance required for appellee.
PER CURIAM.

We affirm the summary denial of appellant's motion to correct illegal sentence. Without passing on the merits of appellant's claim that he did not knowingly or voluntarily enter a plea, the denial is without prejudice to his right to file a rule 3.850 motion in the trial court, should that be appropriate, within thirty (30) days of this opinion. SeeFla. R.Crim. P. 3.850.

Affirmed.

STEVENSON, DAMOORGIAN and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Dimonda v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
May 30, 2012
93 So. 3d 361 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)
Case details for

Dimonda v. State

Case Details

Full title:Nicholas DIMONDA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Date published: May 30, 2012

Citations

93 So. 3d 361 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)