From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dimond v. Verdon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 29, 2004
5 A.D.3d 718 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

2003-04819.

Decided March 29, 2004.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (DiBlasi, J.), entered April 23, 2003, which denied their motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(8) on the ground of lack of personal jurisdiction.

Before: A. GAIL PRUDENTI, P.J., ANITA R. FLORIO, HOWARD MILLER, ROBERT W. SCHMIDT, BARRY A. COZIER, JJ.

Haag Kozar, LLP, Tarrytown, N.Y. (Harold A. Haag of counsel), for appellants.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The defendants raised the affirmative defense of lack of personal jurisdiction in their answer. Almost three months after serving their answer, the defendants moved to dismiss the complaint on the ground that the summons and complaint were not properly served. Having failed to move to dismiss on that ground within 60 days after serving their answer, the defendants waived that defense ( see CPLR 3211[e]; Gillespie v. Perrone, 276 A.D.2d 526; Amerasia Bank v. Saiko Enters., 263 A.D.2d 519, 520; Alaska Seaboard Partners v. Anninos, 259 A.D.2d 572; DeSena v. HIP Hosp., 258 A.D.2d 555). The purported rejection of the defendants' answer did not extend the 60-day time limit.

PRUDENTI, P.J., FLORIO, H. MILLER, SCHMIDT and COZIER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Dimond v. Verdon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 29, 2004
5 A.D.3d 718 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

Dimond v. Verdon

Case Details

Full title:CYNTHIA DIMOND, respondent, v. OLIVIA VERDON, ET AL., appellants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 29, 2004

Citations

5 A.D.3d 718 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
773 N.Y.S.2d 603

Citing Cases

U.S. Bank v. Donovan

Additionally, she did not claim any undue hardship that would have prevented her from making such a motion…

Woleben v. Sutaria

We agree with plaintiff that Supreme Court erred in granting the motion of Thomas L. Greer, M.D. (defendant)…