From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dime Savings Bank of New York v. Higner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 21, 2001
281 A.D.2d 895 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

March 21, 2001.

Appeal from Order of Erie County Court, DiTullio, J. — Vacate Judgment.

PRESENT: PIGOTT, JR., P. J., GREEN, PINE, HURLBUTT AND BURNS, JJ.


Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs, motion granted and default judgment and foreclosure sale vacated.

Memorandum:

County Court erred in denying the motion of David N. Higner (defendant) to vacate the default judgment of foreclosure and the foreclosure sale of property located at 181 Glenhaven Road in the Town of Amherst. After being served with the summons and complaint in the foreclosure action, defendant attempted to reach his attorney by telephone. When he was unable to do so, he wrote a letter to plaintiff's attorney, denying the validity of plaintiff's claim and setting forth the defense that he had made payments for which no accounting had been provided. Defendant further stated in the letter that he has an attorney in this action, and he instructed plaintiff's attorney to "direct all responses to his office." In our view, defendant's letter, which denied the allegations in the complaint and set forth a defense to the action, should have been deemed an answer ( see, Cook v. Freight Force, 139 Misc.2d 459, 460; Bambergers Div. of R. H. Macy Co. v. Smith, 91 Misc.2d 856, 858; cf., Leone v. Johnson, 99 A.D.2d 567, 568). At the very least, the letter should have been deemed a notice of appearance, requiring notice to defendant of the application to seek a default judgment and the foreclosure sale ( see, Leader Fed. Bank for Sav. v. Van Tienhoven, 262 A.D.2d 1078).


Summaries of

Dime Savings Bank of New York v. Higner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 21, 2001
281 A.D.2d 895 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

Dime Savings Bank of New York v. Higner

Case Details

Full title:THE DIME SAVINGS BANK OF NEW YORK, FSB, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. DAVID N…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Mar 21, 2001

Citations

281 A.D.2d 895 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
722 N.Y.S.2d 651

Citing Cases

Wynkoop v. 622A President St. Owners Corp.

Since issue has not been joined by 622A Owners and since the motion for declaratory judgment seeks…

Paulus v. Christopher Vacirca, Inc.

In Chrysler First Fin. Servs. Corp. of Am. v. Burse, 210 A.D.2d 947, 621 N.Y.S.2d 977, the Fourth Department…