Opinion
December, 1905.
Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Hirschberg, P.J., Bartlett, Woodward, Jenks and Rich, JJ., concurred.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Dime Savings Bank of Brooklyn v. Marsh
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 1, 1905
110 App. Div. 917 (N.Y. App. Div. 1905)
Summaries of
Dime Savings Bank of Brooklyn v. Marsh
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 1, 1905
110 App. Div. 917 (N.Y. App. Div. 1905)
Case details for
Dime Savings Bank of Brooklyn v. Marsh
Case Details
Full title:The Dime Savings Bank of Brooklyn, Plaintiff, v. Nathaniel Marsh and…
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Date published: Dec 1, 1905
Citations
110 App. Div. 917 (N.Y. App. Div. 1905)