DiMarino v. Hannigan

Full title: NICHOLAS DiMARINO, Plaintiff, v. LINDA D. HANNIGAN, Defendant.

Court: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA ROCK HILL DIVISION

Date published: Jan 9, 2012

C/A No. :0:11 -01678-CMC-PJG (D.S.C. Jan. 9, 2012)

Opinion

C/A No. :0:11 -01678-CMC-PJG

01-09-2012

NICHOLAS DiMARINO, Plaintiff, v. LINDA D. HANNIGAN, Defendant.

William T. Young III Howell, Gibson & Hughes, PA Attorney for Linda Hannigan

Paige J. Gossett

CONSENT ORDER

This matter comes before this Court upon motions by the pro se Plaintiff, seeking an entry of default against the Defendant, Linda Hannigan (ECF No. 17), who subsequently moved for an Order striking the Plaintiff's request for an entry of default (ECF No. 22). With the consent of the parties, and based upon the fact that a responsive pleading was timely filed on behalf of the Defendant, this Court finds that both motions should be DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_____________

Paige J. Gossett

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
January 9, 2012
Columbia, South Carolina
WE MOVE: By:_____________

William T. Young III

Howell, Gibson & Hughes, PA

Attorney for Linda Hannigan
WE CONSENT: By:__________

Nicholas DiMarino

Plaintiff