sentencing guidelines “have the authority of statutory law”
Summary of this case from State v. DavillaNo. 03-9412.
June 28, 2004.
Sup. Ct. Ore. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of Blakely v. Washington, ante, p. 296. Reported below: 336 Ore. 158, 82 P. 3d 593.
Certiorari Granted — Reversed and Remanded. (See No. 03-1200, ante, p. 649.)
sentencing guidelines “have the authority of statutory law”
Summary of this case from State v. Davillaapplying Blakely to the Oregon sentencing guidelines
Summary of this case from State v. LaffertyFull title:DILTS v. OREGON
Court:U.S.
Date published: Jun 28, 2004
In Dilts I, this court explained how Oregon's sentencing statutes work as a matter of state law and concluded…
State v. Lopez-DanielAlthough the trial court was not given an opportunity to correct the error, we note that, at the time of the…