From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

DiLorenzo v. N.Y.C. Dep't of Buildings

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Nov 14, 2012
100 A.D.3d 750 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)

Opinion

2012-11-14

In the Matter of Helen DiLORENZO, petitioner, v. NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF BUILDINGS, respondent.

Bruce L. Steinowitz, White Plains, N.Y., for petitioner. Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York, N.Y. (Larry A. Sonnenshein and Kathy H. Chang of counsel), for respondent.


Bruce L. Steinowitz, White Plains, N.Y., for petitioner. Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York, N.Y. (Larry A. Sonnenshein and Kathy H. Chang of counsel), for respondent.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the New York City Department of Buildings dated May 3, 2011, which, after a hearing, denied the petitioner's application for a Master Fire Suppression Piping Contractor's license.

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, the petition is denied, and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, with costs.

Judicial review of an administrative determination made after a hearing at which evidence was taken, pursuant to direction by law, is limited to whether the determination is supported by substantial evidence based upon the entire record ( seeCPLR 7803[4] ). Moreover, “ ‘[t]he courts may not weigh the evidence or reject the choice made by [an administrative agency] where the evidence is conflicting and room for choice exists' ” (Matter of Berenhaus v. Ward, 70 N.Y.2d 436, 444, 522 N.Y.S.2d 478, 517 N.E.2d 193, quoting Matter of Stork Rest. v. Boland, 282 N.Y. 256, 267, 26 N.E.2d 247;see Matter of Elite Ready Mix Corp. v. New York State Dept. of Motor Vehs., 92 A.D.3d 678, 937 N.Y.S.2d 877).

Here, contrary to the petitioner's contention, the determination of the New York City Department of Buildings to deny the petitioner's application for a Master Fire Suppression Piping Contractor's license was supported by substantial evidence ( see 300 Gramatan Ave. Assoc. v. State Div. of Human Rights, 45 N.Y.2d 176, 180, 408 N.Y.S.2d 54, 379 N.E.2d 1183;Matter of Shuler v. New York City Hous. Auth., 88 A.D.3d 895, 896–897, 931 N.Y.S.2d 329;Matter of Reingold v. Koch, 111 A.D.2d 688, 690–691, 490 N.Y.S.2d 508,affd.66 N.Y.2d 994, 499 N.Y.S.2d 395, 489 N.E.2d 1297).

RIVERA, J.P., CHAMBERS, HALL and ROMAN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

DiLorenzo v. N.Y.C. Dep't of Buildings

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Nov 14, 2012
100 A.D.3d 750 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
Case details for

DiLorenzo v. N.Y.C. Dep't of Buildings

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Helen DiLORENZO, petitioner, v. NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Nov 14, 2012

Citations

100 A.D.3d 750 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
953 N.Y.S.2d 871
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 7664