From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dillon v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Mar 28, 2003
841 So. 2d 587 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

Opinion

Case No. 2D03-672.

Opinion filed March 28, 2003.

Appeal pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Richard A. Luce, Judge.


Darren C. Dillon appeals the summary denial of his motion to correct illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). He contends his sentence is illegal under this court's decision in Taylor v. State, 818 So.2d 544 (Fla.2d DCA 2002), which held chapter 99-188, Laws of Florida, unconstitutional. Dillon's claim is facially insufficient because he does not allege that the date of his offense was within the window established in Taylor. Therefore, we affirm without prejudice to Dillon's ability to file a facially sufficient motion under rule 3.800(a).

DAVIS and CANADY, JJ., Concur.


Summaries of

Dillon v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Mar 28, 2003
841 So. 2d 587 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)
Case details for

Dillon v. State

Case Details

Full title:DARRIN C. DILLON, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Mar 28, 2003

Citations

841 So. 2d 587 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

Citing Cases

Rodriguez v. State

AFFIRMED. See Jackson v. State, 847 So.2d 1038 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003); Dillon v. State, 841 So.2d 587 (Fla. 2d…