From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dillon v. Gruenwald

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Nov 3, 2014
Case No. 2: 13 CV01614-CL (D. Or. Nov. 3, 2014)

Opinion

Case No. 2: 13 CV01614-CL

11-03-2014

MICHAEL PATRICK DILLON, Plaintiff, v. NP LINDA GRUENWALD, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Magistrate Judge Coffin filed his Findings and Recommendation on September 26, 2014. The matter is now before me. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). No objections have been timely filed. This relieves me of my obligation to give the factual findings de novo review. Lorin Corp. v. Goto & Co., Ltd., 700 F.2d 1202, 1206 (9th Cir. 1982). See also Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error.

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, I adopt Judge Clarke's Findings and Recommendation.

Dated this 3RD day of November, 2014.

/s/_________

Ann Aiken, United States District Judge


Summaries of

Dillon v. Gruenwald

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Nov 3, 2014
Case No. 2: 13 CV01614-CL (D. Or. Nov. 3, 2014)
Case details for

Dillon v. Gruenwald

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL PATRICK DILLON, Plaintiff, v. NP LINDA GRUENWALD, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Date published: Nov 3, 2014

Citations

Case No. 2: 13 CV01614-CL (D. Or. Nov. 3, 2014)