From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dillon v. Auto Truck Transport

Court of Appeals of Virginia
Aug 12, 2008
Record No. 0938-08-3 (Va. Ct. App. Aug. 12, 2008)

Opinion

Record No. 0938-08-3.

August 12, 2008.

Appeal from the Virginia Workers' Compensation Commission.

(Gary Lee Dillon, pro se, on brief).

No brief for appellees.

Present: Judges Kelsey, Petty and Senior Judge Bumgardner.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication.


Gary Lee Dillon (claimant) appeals a decision of the Workers' Compensation Commission affirming the deputy commissioner's (1) determination that claimant's testimony was not credible; (2) denial of claimant's claim for mileage, except as stipulated; (3) denial of claimant's claim for temporary total disability benefits from May 8, 2004 through May 17, 2004; (4) denial of claimant's claim for additional evaluation or treatment by Dr. Bruce A. Sellers; (5) denial of claimant's claim for an eye injury as a compensable consequence of his May 8, 2004 injury; (6) finding that claimant effectively refused medical treatment by Dr. John L. Graves on May 24, 2007, but that he cured that refusal on June 26, 2007; (7) refusal to reinstate claimant's award because he returned to work without reporting wages as required by Code § 65.2-712; and (8) termination of claimant's July 9, 2004 outstanding award, with modification of the termination effective date from "June 6, 2004, inclusive," to "June 6, 2007, inclusive." We have reviewed the record and the commission's opinion and find that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we summarily affirm for the reasons stated by the commission in its final opinion. See Dillon v. Auto Truck Transport, VWC File No. 219-13-95 (Mar. 24, 2008). See Code § 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27. Affirmed.

Because we summarily affirm the commission's decision, we deny the appellees' motion to dismiss. In summarily affirming the commission's decision, we considered only those issues properly before the commission when it rendered its decision, and preserved for appellate review.See Rule 5A:18. Moreover, the record does not reflect any reason to invoke the good cause or ends of justice exceptions to Rule 5A:18.


Summaries of

Dillon v. Auto Truck Transport

Court of Appeals of Virginia
Aug 12, 2008
Record No. 0938-08-3 (Va. Ct. App. Aug. 12, 2008)
Case details for

Dillon v. Auto Truck Transport

Case Details

Full title:GARY LEE DILLON v. AUTO TRUCK TRANSPORT AND ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE…

Court:Court of Appeals of Virginia

Date published: Aug 12, 2008

Citations

Record No. 0938-08-3 (Va. Ct. App. Aug. 12, 2008)