From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dillingham v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Apr 9, 1974
293 So. 2d 80 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1974)

Opinion

No. 73-1235.

April 9, 1974.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Dade County, Ellen Morphonios Rowe, J.

William Bradford Dillingham, in pro per.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and William L. Rogers, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before CARROLL, HENDRY and HAVERFIELD, JJ.


This is an appeal by the defendant, William Bradford Dillingham, from an order denying post-conviction relief under CrPR 3.850, 33 F.S.A.

Appellant was convicted of grand larceny and sentenced to five years in the state penitentiary. The conviction and sentence were appealed to this court and affirmed.

The points relied on in this appeal pursuant to Rule 3.850 are (1) inadequate representation afforded him by his private counsel, and (2) the court's failure to give a jury instruction on an attempt to commit grand larceny as a lesser included offense.

A careful review of the record on the applicable law shows that the trial court was correct in denying the appellant the relief sought. Everett v. State, Fla.App. 1964, 161 So.2d 714; Devlin v. State, Fla. App. 1966, 192 So.2d 786; Byrd v. State, Fla.App. 1969, 220 So.2d 14. See also, Rayner v. State, Fla. 1973, 273 So.2d 759; Williams v. State, Fla. 1973, 285 So.2d 13, 16.

No reversible error having been made to appear the order appealed is affirmed.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Dillingham v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Apr 9, 1974
293 So. 2d 80 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1974)
Case details for

Dillingham v. State

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM BRADFORD DILLINGHAM, APPELLANT, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Apr 9, 1974

Citations

293 So. 2d 80 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1974)