From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dillingham v. Jemison

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 4, 2021
Case No. 2:20-Cv-00474-PSG (AFM) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 4, 2021)

Opinion

Case No. 2:20-Cv-00474-PSG (AFM)

03-04-2021

RICKY ALEXANDER DILLINGHAM, Plaintiff, v. D. JEMISON, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Interim Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. The time for filing Objections to the Report and Recommendation has passed and Objections have not been received.

IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that (1) the Interim Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is accepted and adopted; (2) defendant's Motion to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint (ECF No. 22) is denied; and (3) defendant shall file an answer to the Second Amended Complaint no later than forty-five (45) days from the date of acceptance of this Order. DATED: 3/4/21

/s/_________

PHILIP S. GUTIERREZ

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Dillingham v. Jemison

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 4, 2021
Case No. 2:20-Cv-00474-PSG (AFM) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 4, 2021)
Case details for

Dillingham v. Jemison

Case Details

Full title:RICKY ALEXANDER DILLINGHAM, Plaintiff, v. D. JEMISON, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 4, 2021

Citations

Case No. 2:20-Cv-00474-PSG (AFM) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 4, 2021)