From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dillingham v. Asuncion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 21, 2020
Case No. 2:18-cv-01826-PSG-AFM (C.D. Cal. Jul. 21, 2020)

Opinion

Case No. 2:18-cv-01826-PSG-AFM

07-21-2020

RICKY ALEXANDER DILLINGHAM, Petitioner, v. DEBBIE ASUNCION, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, records on file and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which Petitioner has objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that Judgment be entered (1) denying Petitioner's request for an evidentiary hearing; and (2) denying the Petition and dismissing the action with prejudice. DATED: 7/21/2020

/s/_________

PHILIP S. GUTIERREZ

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Dillingham v. Asuncion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 21, 2020
Case No. 2:18-cv-01826-PSG-AFM (C.D. Cal. Jul. 21, 2020)
Case details for

Dillingham v. Asuncion

Case Details

Full title:RICKY ALEXANDER DILLINGHAM, Petitioner, v. DEBBIE ASUNCION, Warden…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jul 21, 2020

Citations

Case No. 2:18-cv-01826-PSG-AFM (C.D. Cal. Jul. 21, 2020)